Thursday, September 6, 2012

Unequal rates 

This is the last entry you can comment on for September.

Once upon a time, Slovaks, like Thais, paid less than foreigners for certain things, and perhaps they still do in some cases, although this has largely gone by the wayside I think.  Does this system have its merits?  Should the citizens of a country have cheaper or easier access to its natural resources (such as parks) or cultural resources (such as national theatre productions)?  Is it a good idea for private business owners to have a differentiated pricing system?  If something like this hurts tourism, should the government interfere?
at

1 comment:

  1. LatchezarNovember 4, 2012 at 4:36 PM

    This is a comment on an article no one has discussed, instead of a comment on comment for September/October.


    This entire pricing policy appears as nothing more than a scam agenda, hence I cannot find the author’s praises for Thai ingenuity justifiable. I wouldn’t necessarily oppose such double pricing systems, however, what makes it unacceptable in its current form, is the fact that the tourists remain unaware of what they are bargaining for. Had the Thai entrepreneurs provided visible signs, clearly indicating the price gaps, I wouldn’t mind. That way the tourists could at least have the option to evaluate and compare whether their destination is really worth it. Instead, the Thais decide to become the embodiment of a modern Robin Hood, “Foreigners – rich, Thais – poor”. However, this deranged and twisted version of Robin only puts emphasis on the robbing part of the story. While Thais do, indeed, pay seemingly less, the only people reaping the real benefits are the entrepreneurs themselves. Then again, had the tourists been aware of the situation, the so-called industry would most likely falter or at least diminish.

    The other argument the author mentions, which happens to completely boggle my mind, is that Thais should get a discount when visiting Thai landmarks, because they belong to them. In what way do they deserve to see the landmarks more than a tourist? That’s the same as for example an American film producer releasing his movie and charging people extra money at the premiere for not being American! It just doesn’t make any sense.

    In conclusion, I can hardly say that I am a supporter of such double pricing policy. I am perfectly fine with high prices, but at least keep it consistent. If there is a price, it should be the same for everyone. If the government wishes to leech off a foreigner’s wallet, let them do it, but not through this scam. Simply put: Level the entrance fee, so it all is fair and square for everybody.

    ReplyDelete