The main point of this commentary seems to be that psychologists and other experts on trauma appear to thrive in a situation like this, freely commenting on a particular experience which they know little about and generally taking the pessimistic side in terms of the vulnerability/resiliency of the human psyche. What do you think? Do professions like this tend to encourage the bad things that they treat? Should we go to trained professionals like psychologists for advice or help, or is a good friend or family member a better alternative?
Secondly, the kidnapping incident itself would seem to deserve comment (as long as you make clear references to this particular article too). Do you admire this retired couple for the adventurous life they had and the risks they took? Do people have a hypocritical tendency to admire those who take risks that pay off, but say “I would have” or “He/she shouldn’t have” when they fail? What should governments do in a situation like this? Should the “no negotiating” or “no paying ransom” rules always be strictly followed? Finally, if you were a young Somali who was living in a country with no effective government and few if any means to make a living, what might you resort to?
No comments:
Post a Comment